| Proposed Legislation Imposes New Requirements on Private Fund Advisers
Three pieces of draft legislation aimed at tackling key parts of reforming the regulatory structure of the United States financial services industry were released on October 1, 2009. The proposed legislation tightens regulation on "private fund" advisers requiring registration and imposing new record keeping requirements. One of the draft bills is the “Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act of 2009” (the “Private Fund Advisers Act”). The Private Fund Advisers Act would require registration of almost all advisers to “private funds” and the imposition of new record keeping and disclosure requirements for those private fund advisers. “Private Fund” Defined As proposed, a “private fund” is any investment fund that would be an investment company under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 but for the private investment company exemption of Section 3(c)(1) or the qualified purchaser fund exemption of Section 3(c)(7) and, either is organized or created under the laws of the United States or any state, or has 10% or more of its outstanding securities by value owned by United States persons. New Registration Requirements An investment adviser to a private fund will be required to register under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 regardless of the number of clients it may have, but the Advisers Act will continue to prohibit registration of any adviser that is regulated under state law and who has less than $25,000,000 in assets under management. The Advisers Act currently exempts from registration any investment adviser registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a commodity trading advisor whose business does not consist primarily of acting as an investment adviser and who does not act as an investment adviser to a registered investment company or a business development company. The proposed bill will eliminate this exemption as it relates to any adviser to a private fund. A “foreign private fund adviser” will be exempt from the registration and reporting requirements. This term is defined as an investment adviser who:
“Venture Capital Fund” Adviser Exemption The Private Fund Advisers Act requires the SEC to identify and define the term “venture capital fund” and to provide that an adviser to a “venture capital fund” is exempt from registration under the Advisers Act; provided, however, those advisers will be obligated to maintain such records and provide annual or other reports as determined by the SEC to be necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. New Record-Keeping, Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The Private Fund Advisers Act will require that investment advisers to private funds maintain records, and provide reports to the SEC, with regard to:
The bill grants authority to the SEC to require reporting of other additional information and to authorize different reporting requirements for different classes of private fund advisers, based on the particular types or sizes of private funds advised by these advisers. The SEC will be authorized to determine the period or periods during which an investment adviser must maintain its records and to make periodic, special and other examination of those records at any time and from time to time. The adviser must make copies or extracts from its records available to the SEC and the SEC will be mandated to share, on a confidential basis, such information with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and “others entities” identified by the SEC as having systemic risk responsibility. In addition, the new law will require registered investment advisers to provide reports, records, and other documents to investors, prospective investors, counterparties and creditors of any private fund advised by such investment adviser as the SEC may prescribe by rule or regulation. As proposed, the SEC cannot be compelled to disclose any report required to be filed with it, or information contained therein, other than to Congress or any other Federal department or agency or self-regulatory organization requesting the report or information for purposes within the scope of its jurisdiction or in complying with an order of court. |
|||
Allen Matkins Corporate and Securities Attorneys |
||||
| Keith P. Bishop Joe M. Davidson Matthew J. Ertman Debra Dison Hall Brian C. Leck Clark H. Libenson James E. McCormick Daniel G. McIntosh Roger S. Mertz Geoffrey E. Perusse Roberta V. Romberg D. Stanley Rowland Philip C. Schroeder Nick M. Unkovic |
Orange County (949) 553-1313 San Diego (619) 233-1155 Century City (310) 788-2400 Walnut Creek (925) 943-5551 |
Los Angeles (213) 622-5555 San Francisco (415) 837-1515 Del Mar Heights (858) 481-5055 |
||
© 2009 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All rights reserved.
This email is intended for general information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on any specific facts or circumstances. This email was sent by: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP, 515 S. Figueroa Street, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. To stop receiving this publication, just reply and enter "unsubscribe" in the subject line.