Read this online
Allen Matkins Real Estate Jukebox - Current Hits to Keep Time with Market Conditions

May 21 , 2009

Danger Zone play
Landlords Need to Act Quickly After Eviction

GOOD NEWS:  A landlord wins its unlawful detainer case, and the court enters a judgment for possession in favor of the landlord.

BAD NEWS:  The landlord finds itself liable for an injury that occurred in the leased premises after entry of the judgment for possession but before the landlord regained actual possession of the premises, despite the fact that the injury was the result of a dangerous condition of which the landlord had no knowledge.

Could this really happen?  The answer is yes, because of the decision in a recent California case* in which the court established a new duty on landlords who evict tenants.

NEW DUTY:  A landlord has a duty to inspect premises upon entry of a judgment for possession, including reasonable periodic inspections thereafter.

RISK FACED BY LANDLORDS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY:  If a landlord fails to comply with its duty of inspection following the issuance of a judgment for possession, or fails to remedy any dangerous condition that it discovers, then the landlord can be held liable for injuries suffered by third parties as a result of that dangerous condition.

WHY THE NEW DUTY IS A PROBLEM FOR LANDLORDS:  A judgment of possession does NOT give the landlord the right to dispossess a tenant – it just gives the landlord the right to obtain a writ of possession and thereafter instruct the sheriff to dispossess the tenant.

LESSON:  If a landlord decides to evict a tenant, the landlord needs to be ready to take back possession of the leased premises as soon as the court enters a judgment for possession in the unlawful detainer action.  If the landlord waits even a few days to apply for the writ of possession or subsequently delays contacting the sheriff in order to physically oust the tenant and take over possession, the landlord increases its risk of liability to third parties for dangerous conditions at the leased premises.

*Stone v. Center Trust Retail Props., Inc. (2008) 163 Cal. App. 4th 608, 77 Cal. Rptr. 3d 556

Your DJs
Lee F. Gotshall-Maxon
(415)
273-7423
Email Lee
Nancy Lundeen
(415)
273-7477
Email Nancy
Lee A. Edlund
(415)
273-7436
Email Lee

 


Past Hits
The Hits

Subscribe

What is the Jukebox?

Jukebox is a twice-monthly email with a short "hit single" real estate tip.

 

Tell us what you think


About Allen Matkins

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP, founded in 1977, is a California law firm with over 230 attorneys practicing out of seven offices in California. The firm's broad based areas of focus include construction, corporate, real estate, project finance, business litigation, taxation, land use, environmental, bankruptcy and creditors' rights, and employment and labor law. More...

 
Chambers and Partners
Allen Matkins
#1 Real Estate Law Firm in California
Chambers and Partners

2002 - 2008

 

© 2009 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All rights reserved. This email is intended for general information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on any specific facts or circumstances. This email was sent by: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP, 515 S. Figueroa Street, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. To stop receiving this publication, just reply and enter "unsubscribe" in the subject line.