Emily L. Murray

Representative Matters

Litigation

  • Alfaville LLC v. L.A. Signal, et al. (U.S. District Court). Represented landowner in federal court litigation brought under CERCLA regarding historical contamination of property. 
  • Coppola, et al. v. Smith, et al. (U.S. District Court). Represented landowner in multi-party federal court litigation brought under CERCLA, HSAA, and state law common law theories regarding contamination of regional groundwater with PCE. 
  • County of Madera v. City of Fresno (California Superior Court). Represented real party in interest developer in CEQA litigation. 
  • Hiatt, et al. v. AGC Incorporated, et al. (California Superior Court). Represented defendant product manufacturer in asbestos litigation. 
  • Industrial Firm. Represented industrial firm in administrative enforcement matter with respect to NPDES stormwater permit compliance. 
  • Jackson & Monroe v. AlJacks Retail (California Superior Court). Represented developer clients in CEQA and related actions challenging development project in Indio. 
  • Oil and Gas Company. Represented an oil and gas company in an administrative enforcement action brought by Regional Water Quality Control Board with regard to crude oil impacted soil stockpiles. 
  • Santa Barbara Channelkeeper v. Santa Barbara Polo Club (U.S. District Court). Represented owner of private polo club in Clean Water Act citizens suit alleging violations of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation stormwater regulations. 
  • The Right Site Coalition vs. Los Angeles Unified School District (California Superior Court, California Court of Appeals). Represented respondent school district in CEQA litigation, including successful appeal of attorneys fee award in Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court.

Land Use 

  • Developer. Represented developer in environmental review process, including preparation of an environmental impact report, for a major mixed-use development of more than 1 million square feet in Hollywood. 
  • Equity Partner. Represented equity partner in assessment of entitlements, permitting process, and CEQA review for proposed mixed-use development. 
  • Food Distribution Company. Represented company in protecting confidential information contained in a bid proposal to a state agency from disclosure pursuant to CPRA request propounded by a competitor. 
  • Rental Car Company. Represented rental car company in relocation of rental car facilities at LAX, including preparation of environmental documentation under CEQA. 
  • Retail Operator. Represented owner of retail establishment in administrative proceedings concerning selection of an operator for associated City-owned parking facility in Hollywood. 
  • Technology Company. Represented technology company in protecting their confidential information from disclosure to competitors or other members of the public pursuant to CPRA and FOIA requests to state and federal agencies. 
  • Technology Company. Represented technology company with regard to land use, environmental, and NEPA compliance issues in negotiation of 40-year lease of more than 40 acres of unimproved land to construct up to 1.2 million square feet of offices and research and development facilities. 
  • Telecommunications Company. Represented telecommunications companies and tower companies in a variety of contested land use and permitting matters.