Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

A Secured Lender Must Receive Default Interest Under a Chapter 11 Plan Purporting to Cure a Defaulted Loan in the Ninth Circuit

A recent Ninth Circuit decision overturned earlier case law allowing debtors to avoid paying default interest when a defaulted loan was "cured" through a confirmed plan of reorganization.

Legal Alert

1.18.17

In Pacifica L 51 LLC v. New Investments, Inc. (In re New Investments Inc.), 840 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2016), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a secured lender must receive default interest when a debtor attempts to cure and reinstate a defaulted loan through the plan confirmation process. The New Investments decision overruled In re Entz-White Lumber & Supply, Inc., 850 F.2d 1338 (9th Cir. 1988), which allowed a defaulted loan to be cured through a confirmed chapter 11 plan without paying default interest.

The Facts and Procedural Background

The debtor in New Investments borrowed approximately $3 million secured by a hotel property. The loan provided for an 8% non-default and 13% default rate of interest. The debtor subsequently defaulted on the loan and then filed for bankruptcy to stay a foreclosure. During the bankruptcy, the debtor filed a plan of reorganization which proposed to sell the hotel property for substantially more than the outstanding loan, but did not provide for the payment of default interest upon repayment of the secured loan. The lender objected to confirmation of the plan, which the bankruptcy court overruled, and the lender appealed.

The Rationale of the Ninth Circuit

Entz-White was decided prior to the addition of Bankruptcy Code section 1123(d), which provides that "if it is proposed in a plan to cure a default the amount necessary to cure the default shall be determined in accordance with the underlying agreement and applicable non-bankruptcy law." In reversing the Bankruptcy Court's decision, the Ninth Circuit in New Investments determined the plain language of Section 1123(d) requires the payment of default interest to cure a defaulted loan under a plan and renders void Entz-White's prior rule to the contrary.

Impact on Secured Lenders

The New Investments decision now aligns the Ninth Circuit with other Circuits, which have strictly followed Section 1123(d) and require "cure-plans" to include payment of default interest then due and owing as part of any loan reinstatement. The New Investments decision should discourage debtors trying to file for bankruptcy in an attempt to avoid paying default interest on fully-secured loans by purportedly curing and reinstating a defaulted loan through a plan.

SUBSCRIBE

Author

William "Bill" W. Huckins

Partner

San FranciscoT(415) 273-7426whuckins@allenmatkins.com
Email William "Bill" W. Huckins
Download William "Bill" W. Huckins Vcard
William "Bill" W. Huckins LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Restructuring, Insolvency & Bankruptcy

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions
View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer