News & Insights
Legal Alert

Senate Bill (SB) 937 (Wiener) went into effect on January 1, 2025. SB 937 eases the financial burden on residential developers by prohibiting local agencies from imposing fees on specified residential development projects until the final inspection date or certificate of occupancy date. This article summarizes the benefits of SB 937, the projects it applies to, and its caveats.
SB 937 delays upfront payment of Development Impact Fees (DIFs), which are typically due at building permit issuance, to the date of the final inspection, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued, whichever occurs first. Specified exceptions are discussed below. Local agencies are also prohibited from charging interest or other fees and charges for the deferred DIF payment.
DIFs are a burden to developers because they impose significant early costs on development projects. SB 937 provides welcome relief to developers by delaying DIF payments, allowing developers to defer accumulation of upfront construction loans, and eliminating the accrued interest that accompanies such loans. With developers enjoying added flexibility and decreased costs and local agencies receiving the same amount in DIFs, SB 937 is a win-win for both residential developers and the areas they are developing in.
SB 937 applies to “designated residential development projects,” which are residential development projects that meet any of the following conditions:
The local agency may require fees be paid at an earlier time if the local agency determines fees or charges will be collected for public improvements or facilities for which an account has been established and funds appropriated and for which the local agency has adopted a proposed construction schedule or plan before final inspection or issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The local agency may also collect fees at an earlier time if the fees or charges are to reimburse expenditures previously made. Utility connections fees may be collected when an application for service is received, provided those fees do not exceed the costs incurred by the utility provider resulting from the connection activities. Moreover, the definition of designated residential development projects is fairly limited, and developers should take precautions to ensure their project qualifies for delayed DIF payments.
Authors
Partner
Associate
Associate
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer