Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

The Ninth Circuit Allows Oversecured Creditors in Bankruptcy to Recover Default Interest

This alert pertains to loan enforcement and entitlement to interest and affects any party to a secured debt obligation that provides for default interest.

Legal Alert

8.24.08

In General Electric Capital Corporation v. Future Media Productions, Inc. 2008 WL3091471 (9th Cir. 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ruled that oversecured creditors whose claims are paid outside of a plan of reorganization in bankruptcy are entitled to default interest pursuant to their state law contractual rights. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit clarified a misapplication of the rule it announced in Entz-White Lumber & Supply, Inc. v. Great Western Bank & Trust, (850 F.2d 1338 (9th Cir. 1988)) and joined the approach in many bankruptcy courts and two other circuit courts of appeals.

In Entz-White, the Ninth Circuit had earlier announced the rule that an oversecured creditor was not entitled to default interest where its claim was paid in full under the terms of a confirmed Chapter 11 plan. There, the Ninth Circuit found that the Bankruptcy Code specifically authorizes a plan reorganization to cure the consequences of a default.

In Future Media, the bankruptcy court extended Entz-White's rule outside the context of a Chapter 11 plan and denied GECC default interest (which amounted to an additional 2% per annum), when its claim was paid as a result of asset sales.

The Ninth Circuit reversed the bankruptcy court

The Ninth Circuit pointed to the general premise recently emphasized by the Supreme Court in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (127 S.Ct. 1199 (2007)) that a creditor's entitlement in bankruptcy arises in the first instance from the underlying substantive law creating the debtor's obligations, subject only to any qualifying or contrary provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. As such, the Ninth Circuit found that the default rate should be enforced, subject only to the substantive law governing the loan agreement or an express provision of the Bankruptcy Code to the contrary. Outside the context of a plan of reorganization, the Ninth Circuit found no qualifying or contrary provision of the Bankruptcy Code barring the recovery of default interest. Thus, under the rule announced by Ninth Circuit in Future Media, outside the context of a plan of reorganization, "the bankruptcy court should apply a presumption of allowability for the contracted for default rate, provided that the rate is not unenforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law."

Notably, not only does the decision in Future Media clarify an oversecured creditor's right to recover default interest in bankruptcy, but, in light of the Supreme Court's instruction in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., it reflects an increasing acknowledgement by the courts of the inherent limitations of the Bankruptcy Code and growing deference by the courts to nonbankruptcy substantive law in the absence of express contrary provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

If you are trying to claim or oppose default interest in bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy and Creditors' Rights attorneys at Allen Matkins are available to answer any questions you might have.

SUBSCRIBE

Author

William "Bill" W. Huckins

Partner

San FranciscoT(415) 273-7426whuckins@allenmatkins.com
Email William "Bill" W. Huckins
Download William "Bill" W. Huckins Vcard
William "Bill" W. Huckins LinkedIn

RELATED INDUSTRIES

  • Financial Services

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Legal Alert

Appellate Decision Underscores Title Review as Critical to Lien Priority

12.03.18

Event

CONNECT FrameWorks: Corporate Valuations

12.06.17

Photo of Century City skyline

Event

OP Joint Venture Shark Tank

1.21.16

Legal Alert

Financial Institutions May Post Online Privacy Disclosures

12.02.14

Legal Alert

Los Angeles Wildfire Resources: What to do About Your Mortgage

2.19.25

Legal Alert

Updates to the Corporate Transparency Act's Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

12.24.24

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Legal Alert

How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

11.19.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Continues to Expand New York Office

8.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Ranked in Top Tier of California Real Estate Law Firms by Chambers USA for 21st Consecutive Year

6.03.22

Press, Media, & Articles

Representing National Real Estate Lenders

12.09.21

Ground up view of skyscrapers at dusk

Press, Media, & Articles

Banks See Rise in Delinquent Construction Loans. Don't Panic.

6.30.20

Legal Alert

Lenders and Insurance: Are Your Bases Covered? A Checklist for Confirming Lenders' Rights in Borrowers' Insurance Proceeds

5.04.20

Legal Alert

Staying Out Of The Penalty Box: New Appellate Court Decision Provides Intriguing New Angle On What Constitutes An Unenforceable Penalty

2.18.20

Press, Media, & Articles

Let There Be Lite: There’s a Whole Lotta Stretching Going On in Today’s Market

12.12.19

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Legal Alert

Entities Engaged Solely In The Enforcement of Security Interests Are Not "Debt Collectors" Under The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

4.15.19

Legal Alert

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Critical Homeowner Bill of Rights Satisfaction Requirement

12.12.18

Legal Alert

Appellate Decision Underscores Title Review as Critical to Lien Priority

12.03.18

Event

CONNECT FrameWorks: Corporate Valuations

12.06.17

Photo of Century City skyline

Event

OP Joint Venture Shark Tank

1.21.16

Legal Alert

Financial Institutions May Post Online Privacy Disclosures

12.02.14

Legal Alert

Los Angeles Wildfire Resources: What to do About Your Mortgage

2.19.25

Legal Alert

Updates to the Corporate Transparency Act's Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

12.24.24

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Legal Alert

How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

11.19.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Continues to Expand New York Office

8.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Ranked in Top Tier of California Real Estate Law Firms by Chambers USA for 21st Consecutive Year

6.03.22

Press, Media, & Articles

Representing National Real Estate Lenders

12.09.21

Ground up view of skyscrapers at dusk

Press, Media, & Articles

Banks See Rise in Delinquent Construction Loans. Don't Panic.

6.30.20

Legal Alert

Lenders and Insurance: Are Your Bases Covered? A Checklist for Confirming Lenders' Rights in Borrowers' Insurance Proceeds

5.04.20

Legal Alert

Staying Out Of The Penalty Box: New Appellate Court Decision Provides Intriguing New Angle On What Constitutes An Unenforceable Penalty

2.18.20

Press, Media, & Articles

Let There Be Lite: There’s a Whole Lotta Stretching Going On in Today’s Market

12.12.19

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Legal Alert

Entities Engaged Solely In The Enforcement of Security Interests Are Not "Debt Collectors" Under The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

4.15.19

Legal Alert

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Critical Homeowner Bill of Rights Satisfaction Requirement

12.12.18

Legal Alert

Appellate Decision Underscores Title Review as Critical to Lien Priority

12.03.18

Event

CONNECT FrameWorks: Corporate Valuations

12.06.17

Photo of Century City skyline

Event

OP Joint Venture Shark Tank

1.21.16

Legal Alert

Financial Institutions May Post Online Privacy Disclosures

12.02.14

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer