Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

AB 98 Will Have Dramatic Effects On Development Of Future Logistics Facilities

9.19.24

On August 31, the California legislature adopted AB 98. Governor Newsom has until September 30, 2024, to sign or veto AB 98. If the bill becomes law, it will have impacts on all warehouse developments, regardless of whether there are any sensitive receptors near the potential warehouse site. Because AB 98 was rushed through the legislative process, it has numerous uncertainties, and unclear provisions. Developers who are contemplating the development of warehouse facilities should attempt to “commence a local entitlement process” before September 30, 2024, in order to be exempt from AB 98. Projects that have received an approval from a local government before January 1, 2025, also will be exempt from AB 98. These two exemptions of AB 98 are not perpetual. If “no development activity” occurs within five years of approval of all entitlements, these exemptions expire.

The following summarizes some of the new development standards which will be adopted if AB 98 becomes law:

If a logistics use is not exempt from AB 98, the first set of standards commence on January 1, 2025 and will apply to all logistic uses. These standards include the submission of a truck routing plan, truck route signage, anti-idling signage, positioning of entry gates, and a 2-1 housing replacement obligation if dwelling units will be demolished.

The remaining standards commence January 1, 2026, except for logistics use developments with a loading bay within 900 feet of a sensitive receptor that require a zone change to industrial — for these projects, most of the development standards likely become effective September 30, 2024.

Projects that: (1) cannot be designed to provide more than 900 feet of separation from its loading docks to the nearest sensitive receptor; or (2) are within the Warehouse Concentration Region and require a zone change to industrial, will be subject to the bill’s more restrictive standards.

If a logistics use development cannot meet the specified development standards, the city or county is prohibited from approving the project.

Some of these requirements include: providing a separate heavy truck entrance; siting logistics use developments along qualifying roadways; maintaining specified buffering and screening distances from sensitive receptors; orientation and circulation requirements; and differing requirements of solar installation based on the size of the building, including, for some types of projects, installation of sufficient solar facilities to generate electricity to service the entire project.

In the event that Governor Newsom signs AB 98, we will provide an updated E-Alert which goes into more detail regarding the various restrictions and requirements that will dictate the siting, design, and operation of warehouses.

SUBSCRIBE

Authors

John C. Condas

Partner

Orange CountyT(949) 851-5551jcondas@allenmatkins.com
Email John C. Condas
Download John C. Condas Vcard
John C. Condas LinkedIn

Jonathan Shardlow

Partner

Orange CountyT(949) 851-5422jshardlow@allenmatkins.com
Email Jonathan Shardlow
Download Jonathan Shardlow Vcard

Benjamin N. Patterson

Associate

Orange CountyT(949) 851-5454bpatterson@allenmatkins.com
Email Benjamin N. Patterson
Download Benjamin N. Patterson Vcard
Benjamin N. Patterson LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Land Use

  • Environmental & Natural Resources

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Legal Alert

Effective Immediately: CEQA Reform Legislation

7.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Eight Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

6.27.25

Press, Media, & Articles

2025 Land Use, Environmental & Natural Resources Update

6.18.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

8.08.25

Legal Alert

White House Aims To Accelerate Environmental Permitting For Data Centers

8.06.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

8.01.25

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.25.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Secures Major Federal Court Victory in High-Stakes Land Dispute

7.23.25

Event

CEQA Reform Legislation and the Impact of AB 130 and SB 131

7.23.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.18.25

Legal Alert

Project Applicants Can Now Pay for Expedited Federal Environmental Review Under NEPA

7.16.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.11.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Builder’s remedy could help address housing crisis in Oregon

7.03.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.03.25

Press, Media, & Articles

How CEQA Reforms Address California's Housing Squeeze

7.03.25

Legal Alert

Effective Immediately: CEQA Reform Legislation

7.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Eight Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

6.27.25

Press, Media, & Articles

2025 Land Use, Environmental & Natural Resources Update

6.18.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

8.08.25

Legal Alert

White House Aims To Accelerate Environmental Permitting For Data Centers

8.06.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

8.01.25

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.25.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Secures Major Federal Court Victory in High-Stakes Land Dispute

7.23.25

Event

CEQA Reform Legislation and the Impact of AB 130 and SB 131

7.23.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.18.25

Legal Alert

Project Applicants Can Now Pay for Expedited Federal Environmental Review Under NEPA

7.16.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.11.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Builder’s remedy could help address housing crisis in Oregon

7.03.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.03.25

Press, Media, & Articles

How CEQA Reforms Address California's Housing Squeeze

7.03.25

Legal Alert

Effective Immediately: CEQA Reform Legislation

7.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Eight Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

6.27.25

Press, Media, & Articles

2025 Land Use, Environmental & Natural Resources Update

6.18.25

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer