Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

Joshua Tree Conservation Plan Remains Under Review

Environmental & Natural Resources

2.25.25

The California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) accepted public comment on the draft Western Joshua Tree Conservation Plan (Draft Conservation Plan) at its February 12, 2025 meeting, but no formal action was taken.

As detailed in our previous alert, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) released the Draft Conservation Plan to the Commission on December 12, 2024, as required by the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act (Act). The Draft Conservation Plan sets forth management practices and guidelines for the avoidance and minimization of impacts to western Joshua trees. 

The Commission’s February 12 meeting featured a presentation by CDFW, substantive discussion by the Commissioners, and robust public comment. Many commenters expressed concern about the cost and ultimate feasibility of the Draft Conservation Plan’s requirements. In particular, the Large Scale Solar Association voiced concerns regarding the Draft Conservation Plan’s potential to interfere with the siting and development of solar energy projects, indicating that additional costs generated by required mitigation measures would be passed on to ratepayers. Residents and politicians from desert communities — where Joshua trees are most abundant — focused on the Draft Conservation Plan’s costs and obligations as potential hindrances to affordable housing and local job opportunities. Commenters emphasized that collaboration with CDFW is essential in developing a workable and sustainable conservation effort. 

The Commission acknowledged the public comments and ultimately declined to take any formal action at the meeting. Written comments are still being accepted on a rolling basis, though any substantive changes to the Draft Conservation Plan should be submitted by the beginning of March to be considered. The Act mandates that the Commission must take action to adopt the Conservation Plan by June 30, 2025.

The Commission will review the Draft Conservation Plan again at its April 16-17, 2025, meeting. In advance of that meeting, CDFW confirmed it will publish a revised set of Joshua tree relocation guidelines and a list of proposed changes to the Draft Conservation Plan. CDFW Director Bonham also suggested that, in the interim, CDFW may host workshops and/or other community outreach events to solicit further public feedback, though no further details have been provided.

Allen Matkins will continue to provide legal updates as developments occur. Please reach out to the firm’s Natural Resources Team if you would like to learn more about the Act or the Draft Conservation Plan.

SUBSCRIBE

Authors

Jennifer Jeffers

Senior Counsel

San FranciscoT(415) 273-8417jjeffers@allenmatkins.com
Email Jennifer Jeffers
Download Jennifer Jeffers Vcard
Jennifer Jeffers LinkedIn

Benjamin Brown

Associate

San DiegoT(619) 235-1546bsbrown@allenmatkins.com
Email Benjamin Brown
Download Benjamin Brown Vcard
Benjamin Brown LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Environmental & Natural Resources

  • Land Use

RELATED INDUSTRIES

  • Energy & Utilities

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

4.10.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.04.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

4.25.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.25.25

Legal Alert

Federal Agencies Propose Rescission of “Harm” Definition Under Endangered Species Act

4.24.25

Legal Alert

White House Council on Environmental Quality Releases Draft NEPA Template Following CEQ’s Rescission of Longstanding Regulations

4.22.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.18.25

Photo of Century City skyline

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

4.17.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update 

4.11.25

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

4.10.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.04.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

4.25.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.25.25

Legal Alert

Federal Agencies Propose Rescission of “Harm” Definition Under Endangered Species Act

4.24.25

Legal Alert

White House Council on Environmental Quality Releases Draft NEPA Template Following CEQ’s Rescission of Longstanding Regulations

4.22.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.18.25

Photo of Century City skyline

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

4.17.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update 

4.11.25

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

4.10.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.04.25

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer