Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

Retailers: Potential Problems When Dealing with Hazardous Waste

Environmental & Natural Resources

1.11.21

Recently, Dana Palmer, a partner at Allen Matkins, presented a webinar entitled Hazardous Waste Management & Regulatory Interpretations: Perils & Pitfalls for Companies Regarding Salvageable/Usable Goods vs. Waste. The webinar focused on the challenges of complying with federal and state environmental laws regarding the proper disposal of hazardous waste, particularly as they relate to retail goods moving through the supply chain.

Why is this important? Because California and other states’ environmental laws are different and sometimes more stringent than federal laws, often tripping up companies operating nationally with the same handling processes in each state. What is not hazardous waste in one state might be hazardous waste in another. The failure to recognize this, in California in particular, can (and has) cost retailers and transporters millions of dollars in settlements.

Where do the potential problems lie, and what can companies do to protect themselves from such large penalties? Here are five main takeaways from the webinar:

1. What Constitutes Hazardous Waste?

This is an easy-sounding question with a complex answer that may vary from state to state, and which sometimes requires environmental lawyers or other specialists to answer. As applied to retail goods, the answer may in fact be even tougher to determine and subject to greater disagreement. At the federal level, hazardous waste generally has one or more of these four characteristics: ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity. It can be a solid, liquid, or gas. Outside of these characteristics, the federal and state governments have specified additional items as hazardous wastes. While it is readily apparent that oils, solvents, cleaning fluids, and pesticides might be classified as hazardous waste, the “hazardous” nature of other materials may not be so obvious. Simple household items like light bulbs, alkaline batteries, aerosol cans, expired drugs, electric toys, office equipment, body lotion, and baby shampoo have been found to meet the criteria as hazardous waste in California. Other states regulate idiosyncratically in this area, and it is important to check the law and not assume standard disposal is appropriate.

2. Who Is at Risk?

Retailers, distributors, transporters, and any other companies handling goods going to the retailer or rejected upon delivery to the retailer can be prosecuted for improper disposal of hazardous waste. In the trucking context, a carrier transports goods to a retail store and the store could reject the shipment due to damage occurring en route, and now the carrier now must decide what to do with it. In some cases, goods are directed from carriers to salvage centers that resell, salvage, donate, or dispose of the goods. Goods that have become unsalable at a retail location are often sent to reverse logistics centers. When discarding products, both reverse logistics and salvage centers must be careful to handle and dispose of these goods in compliance with applicable hazardous materials and hazardous waste laws. Failure to do so could subject those centers, as well as arguably the retailers and carriers sending goods to them, to liability and fines.

If retailers themselves discard products because they have become unsaleable due to damage, a lack of demand, the introduction of new versions, recalls, or seasonal products being out of date, they must also ensure that goods that can be classified as hazardous waste are disposed of properly. Any entity that does not do so can be held legally responsible and is subject to prosecution.

3. How Do Prosecutors Discover Violations?

The phrase “dumpster diving” doesn’t just apply to a frugal soul looking for discarded items that might be useful or valuable. Prosecutors engage in a form of dumpster diving to identify businesses that improperly dispose of hazardous materials. They monitor when trash is being picked up (often at a retail location) and follow the trash truck to the transfer station. They detain the truck and, keeping the waste separate from other incoming waste, sort through the waste from that store and look for items that do not belong in the municipal waste. Even a few small items disposed of improperly can raise red flags and prompt further investigation. In recent years, prosecutors have become less willing to accept improper materials in municipal waste streams, even when the violation seems less than flagrant, unintentional, or not involving an obviously questionable item.

4. Why Is This Especially Challenging for Retailers?

The laws regarding hazardous waste disposal were enacted with large industrial companies in mind. When applied to retailers, compliance becomes a much more complicated matter. While an industrial company usually deals with, at most, a couple dozen hazardous waste streams that most people would instinctively understand to be hazardous, a large retailer can stock literally thousands of different items on the shelves and have hundreds of locations throughout the country. The waste stream is extremely complex, and employees — which can number into the tens of thousands with frequent turnover — have multiple responsibilities and may not be trained to know which items are classified as hazardous waste when discarded. The simple act of an employee throwing old light bulbs into the dumpster behind the store can result in legal troubles.

5. How Can Companies Protect Themselves?

In the webinar, Palmer recommends three main ways that businesses can protect themselves.

  • Watch the trash because dumpster-diving prosecutors are. No items that qualify as “hazardous waste” or “hazardous material” should be discarded in the municipal trash. If they are found, remove them for proper disposal. While this may seem like a hassle, it could end up saving millions of dollars and potential criminal liability in the long run.
  • Train employees to recognize what constitutes hazardous wastes and to dispose of them properly. A business-wide training program is an investment that is well worth the expense.
  • A third-party audit can reveal non-compliance issues that employees and even managers are likely to miss. Palmer recommends hiring an outside company to perform such an audit to help avoid costly — albeit innocent — mistakes. Palmer notes that hiring such a company directly through legal counsel can provide a better (if not infallible) basis on which to later claim privilege over the audit’s results.

Because the retail space involves different players and an enormous number of products, it can be a challenge to comply with strict laws regarding the proper management and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes. But taking the proper steps to do so will result in benefits to the environment, to the company’s bottom line, and to the company’s reputation.

SUBSCRIBE

Author

Dana P. Palmer

Partner

Century CityT(310) 788-2444dpalmer@allenmatkins.com
Email Dana P. Palmer
Download Dana P. Palmer Vcard
Dana P. Palmer LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Environmental & Natural Resources

RELATED INDUSTRIES

  • Shopping Center, Retail & Mixed-Use

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Legal Alert

Birds, Trees, and Bees – Oh My! Practical Guidance for Addressing Candidate Species in CEQA Analysis

6.18.25

Legal Alert

California Battery Energy Storage Update

6.18.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

California Continues to Promote Clean Energy Transition Despite Federal Backstepping on Clean Energy and Hydrogen Funding

6.18.25

Legal Alert

California’s New Climate-Related Disclosure Laws: Requirements, Compliance Costs, and Deadlines for Impacted Businesses

6.18.25

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.25.25

Event

CEQA Reform Legislation and the Impact of AB 130 and SB 131

7.23.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.18.25

Legal Alert

Project Applicants Can Now Pay for Expedited Federal Environmental Review Under NEPA

7.16.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.11.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.03.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Press, Media, & Articles

How CEQA Reforms Address California's Housing Squeeze

7.03.25

Legal Alert

Effective Immediately: CEQA Reform Legislation

7.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Eight Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

6.27.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Press, Media, & Articles

2025 Land Use, Environmental & Natural Resources Update

6.18.25

Legal Alert

Beyond Sackett: California’s Expanding Role in Wetlands Permitting and the Future of “Waters of the State”

6.18.25

Legal Alert

Birds, Trees, and Bees – Oh My! Practical Guidance for Addressing Candidate Species in CEQA Analysis

6.18.25

Legal Alert

California Battery Energy Storage Update

6.18.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

California Continues to Promote Clean Energy Transition Despite Federal Backstepping on Clean Energy and Hydrogen Funding

6.18.25

Legal Alert

California’s New Climate-Related Disclosure Laws: Requirements, Compliance Costs, and Deadlines for Impacted Businesses

6.18.25

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.25.25

Event

CEQA Reform Legislation and the Impact of AB 130 and SB 131

7.23.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.18.25

Legal Alert

Project Applicants Can Now Pay for Expedited Federal Environmental Review Under NEPA

7.16.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.11.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

7.03.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Press, Media, & Articles

How CEQA Reforms Address California's Housing Squeeze

7.03.25

Legal Alert

Effective Immediately: CEQA Reform Legislation

7.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Eight Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

6.27.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Press, Media, & Articles

2025 Land Use, Environmental & Natural Resources Update

6.18.25

Legal Alert

Beyond Sackett: California’s Expanding Role in Wetlands Permitting and the Future of “Waters of the State”

6.18.25

Legal Alert

Birds, Trees, and Bees – Oh My! Practical Guidance for Addressing Candidate Species in CEQA Analysis

6.18.25

Legal Alert

California Battery Energy Storage Update

6.18.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

California Continues to Promote Clean Energy Transition Despite Federal Backstepping on Clean Energy and Hydrogen Funding

6.18.25

Legal Alert

California’s New Climate-Related Disclosure Laws: Requirements, Compliance Costs, and Deadlines for Impacted Businesses

6.18.25

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer