Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

Appellate Decision Underscores Title Review as Critical to Lien Priority

Legal Alert

12.03.18

In a decision recently certified for publication, Bear Creek Master Ass'n v. S. Cal. Inv'rs, Inc., the California Court of Appeal found that an assessment lien recorded against a golf course property in 2014 had priority over a deed of trust recorded against the same property a year earlier, in 2013. On its face, the decision would seem to be at odds with California's well-established "first in time, first in right" lien priority rules. The unique twist in Bear Creek was that the holder of the 2014 lien, the Bear Creek Mountain Association (Association), claimed priority over the 2013 deed of trust on the basis of a "claim of lien" created in its favor nearly 30 years before, in 1984, in connection with a recorded set of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) governing the property. In essence, the Association argued that the CC&Rs created a lien right in 1984, to which any associated and subsequently recorded lien would relate back. While the Court of Appeal did not accept the Association's argument regarding the "relation back" doctrine, it agreed that the Association's "inchoate" lien rights, created in 1984, established a procedure whereby affiliated, but later-recorded, assessment liens would be recognized as priority interests.

As a result of this decision, secured lenders, and holders of any critical instruments affecting title to real property, should carefully review all documents recorded against a property.

Facts and Procedural Background

In 1984, the developer of the golf course property in question recorded the CC&Rs, which granted the Association the right to maintain the property if its owner failed to do so. To that end, the CC&Rs granted the Association a "claim of lien, with power of sale, on the [property] to secure payment to [the Association] of any and all Assessments levied against any and all owners of the [property]," and further provided that such lien would "have priority over all liens or claims created subsequent to the recordation of" the CC&Rs. The only exceptions to this priority were for tax liens and the lien of a first deed of trust or first mortgage.

On August 29, 2014, the Association recorded an assessment lien against the property. However, almost a year prior to this recordation, on September 12, 2013, another party, Southern California Investors, Inc. (SCI), had recorded a third deed of trust against the property. SCI later instituted non-judicial foreclosure proceedings on the deed of trust and advised the Association that its assessment lien had been extinguished in the foreclosure. The Association disputed that claim, but the trial court ruled in favor of SCI, determining that its deed of trust had priority over the Association's later-recorded assessment lien. The Association appealed and the Court of Appeal reversed.

Rationale Underlying the Decision

Notably, the Court of Appeal did not accept the Association’s argument that its 2014 lien was created and perfected by the 1984 CC&Rs. It also rejected the Association’s argument that its lien was entitled to priority treatment because it “related back” to the CC&Rs. Instead, the Court of Appeal determined that the CC&Rs created an inchoate or contingent "claim of lien" in favor of the Association, but that the assessment lien was not created or perfected until 2014. However, because the CC&Rs explicitly modified the otherwise-applicable "first in time, first in right" rule on lien priorities in order to prioritize later-recorded Association liens, the Association's lien was entitled to priority over the SCI deed of trust, which was recorded earlier.

Potential Lessons

The Bear Creek decision stands as a cautionary tale to lien holders, and particularly to secured lenders who expect their liens to enjoy priority status. Secured lenders, and holders of any critical instruments affecting title to real property, should carefully review all documents recorded against a property, because California's default "first in time, first in right" rule can be modified, potentially to the significant detriment of subsequent lien holders.

SUBSCRIBE

Author

Joshua A. del Castillo

Partner

Los AngelesT(213) 955-5591jdelcastillo@allenmatkins.com
Email Joshua A. del Castillo
Download Joshua A. del Castillo Vcard
Joshua A. del Castillo LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Real Estate Disputes

  • Restructuring, Insolvency & Bankruptcy

  • Construction Litigation

RELATED INDUSTRIES

  • Financial Services

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Continues to Expand New York Office

8.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Six Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.24

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Represents Smart Earth Technologies LLC in Confirming Chapter 11 Plan that Resolves Over $100 Million in Liabilities

3.27.24

Press, Media, & Articles

WeWork Explores Bankruptcy Loan Options Amid Landlord Dispute

2.05.24

Event

Receivers' Huddle Series: Bar Orders post Purdue Pharma

6.10.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: How are developers navigating market uncertainty related to tariffs?

5.28.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Second Rite Aid Bankruptcy Underscores Importance of Vendor Role

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Prevails in High-Stakes Leasing Dispute Against Mission Housing

3.04.25

Legal Alert

Los Angeles Wildfire Resources: What to do About Your Mortgage

2.19.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Ivan Gold Comments on Modular Home Crisis in San Francisco Chronicle

2.03.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Big Lots Sale Hearing to Continue Tomorrow, Dec. 31, at 10 am ET; Debtors Warn Sale to Gordon Brothers Must Close This Week

1.02.25

Legal Alert

Updates to the Corporate Transparency Act's Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

12.24.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Big Lots Sale to Nexus Falls Apart, Plans to Close Business

12.19.24

Legal Alert

How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

11.19.24

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Receives Top Rankings from Benchmark Litigation US 2025

10.09.24

Press, Media, & Articles

64 Allen Matkins Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers in America®

8.15.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Continues to Expand New York Office

8.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Six Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.24

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Represents Smart Earth Technologies LLC in Confirming Chapter 11 Plan that Resolves Over $100 Million in Liabilities

3.27.24

Press, Media, & Articles

WeWork Explores Bankruptcy Loan Options Amid Landlord Dispute

2.05.24

Event

Receivers' Huddle Series: Bar Orders post Purdue Pharma

6.10.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: How are developers navigating market uncertainty related to tariffs?

5.28.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Second Rite Aid Bankruptcy Underscores Importance of Vendor Role

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Prevails in High-Stakes Leasing Dispute Against Mission Housing

3.04.25

Legal Alert

Los Angeles Wildfire Resources: What to do About Your Mortgage

2.19.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Ivan Gold Comments on Modular Home Crisis in San Francisco Chronicle

2.03.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Big Lots Sale Hearing to Continue Tomorrow, Dec. 31, at 10 am ET; Debtors Warn Sale to Gordon Brothers Must Close This Week

1.02.25

Legal Alert

Updates to the Corporate Transparency Act's Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

12.24.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Big Lots Sale to Nexus Falls Apart, Plans to Close Business

12.19.24

Legal Alert

How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

11.19.24

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Receives Top Rankings from Benchmark Litigation US 2025

10.09.24

Press, Media, & Articles

64 Allen Matkins Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers in America®

8.15.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Continues to Expand New York Office

8.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Six Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.24

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Represents Smart Earth Technologies LLC in Confirming Chapter 11 Plan that Resolves Over $100 Million in Liabilities

3.27.24

Press, Media, & Articles

WeWork Explores Bankruptcy Loan Options Amid Landlord Dispute

2.05.24

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer